Integrations

Clever vs. ClassLink
for K‑12 rostering.

Every K‑12 district picks one. They're both good. They're not the same. Here's how they actually compare.

Talk to Alma
The short answer

Clever is free to districts (paid by app developers) and simpler to deploy. ClassLink is paid by districts and offers deeper identity management, more granular controls, and stronger IT features. For small to mid‑size districts with straightforward needs, Clever is often the right pick. For larger districts or IT teams that want deeper control, ClassLink usually wins. Both handle rostering and SSO effectively.

What both platforms do

Both platforms solve the same core problem.

Both Clever and ClassLink connect your student information system to the many third‑party applications your district uses. Both automate rostering, both provide single sign‑on, and both maintain data privacy. The differences are in business model, feature depth, and IT experience.

What both platforms do:

  • Roster automation: student and teacher account creation in connected apps
  • Single sign‑on: users log in once and access multiple apps
  • Data privacy controls: districts specify what data each app receives
  • App library: connections to hundreds of ed-tech apps
  • SIS integration: pulls data from PowerSchool, Infinite Campus, Skyward, Alma, and others

Where they differ:

  • Business model: Clever is free to districts; ClassLink is paid
  • IT depth: ClassLink offers more granular identity management
  • Analytics: ClassLink provides deeper usage data
  • Launchpad: ClassLink includes a customizable launchpad; Clever's is simpler
  • Directory integration: ClassLink often handles Active Directory more robustly

Common questions, answered directly.

Yes, for districts. Clever's business model is that ed-tech app developers pay Clever to be listed and to integrate with the platform. Districts pay nothing to use Clever for rostering and SSO. This model has been sustainable and Clever is now widely used across K‑12.

ClassLink charges districts based on user count, with pricing that varies by district size and features. Districts typically pay because ClassLink provides features that Clever's free model doesn't - deeper analytics, more granular controls, and stronger identity management. Contact ClassLink directly for current pricing.

Both have hundreds of ed-tech app integrations. Clever has historically had a larger app library, while ClassLink has been strong on the IT and identity side. Both keep growing. Most common K‑12 apps work with both platforms. If a specific critical app is only on one platform, that can be a decisive factor.

Alma integrates cleanly with both ecosystems, so this choice can be made independently of your SIS decision - districts don't need to pick their rostering platform around SIS compatibility when using Alma.

Clever is usually the practical choice for small districts. It's free, easy to deploy, and handles rostering and SSO effectively. Districts under 1,000 students rarely need the deeper features ClassLink provides. Starting with Clever and potentially moving to ClassLink later if needs grow is a reasonable path.

ClassLink tends to win at scale. Larger districts benefit from ClassLink's identity management, single-tenant hosting options, and deeper IT controls. Districts with complex directory structures or that need robust reporting on app usage often find ClassLink justifies its cost. Some very large districts also use ClassLink as a broader identity and access management platform beyond ed-tech.

Yes, though it requires effort. Rosters need to be reconfigured, app connections need to be re-established, and users need to be transitioned. Most districts don't switch frequently because the transition consumes IT time. Choose thoughtfully at the start, but the choice isn't permanent.

Not significantly. Any modern SIS should work with both Clever and ClassLink through OneRoster or direct integration. Confirm during SIS evaluation that your rostering platform is supported, but this shouldn't be a decisive SIS factor. Both Clever and ClassLink integrate with the major SIS platforms including Alma.

Alma integrates with both Clever and ClassLink. Ask about the specific integration approach that fits your district's existing rostering platform.

Ready to see how Alma handles this?

Get straight answers to the questions this guide raises. Schedule a walkthrough with Alma.

Schedule a Demo

Related guides

What Is OneRoster and Why Does It Matter
SIS Google Classroom Integration
What IT Directors Need From an SIS